Home Crypto Scaling Agile Teams: When Bigger Isn’t Always Better

Scaling Agile Teams: When Bigger Isn’t Always Better

0
Scaling Agile Teams: When Bigger Isn’t Always Better

[ad_1]

Scaling Agile Teams
  • Daily scrums are not efficient. When there are too many members in your team, it takes time for each to explain the process they have done. Of course, this will make it difficult for a situation if one of the team members clashes or even hinders the search for a solution. So you need to consider forming a small team in solving various problems and issues experienced by each team member.
  • Potential for conflict between each member. Overlapping in completing a task will occur if your team members have too many. So there is ineffective communication when carrying out the sprint. So from the start, it is necessary to ascertain what responsibilities are developed by each member.
  • Dilemma on decision making. While having more people can help the team arrive at better decisions, having too many people might drive the team to a deadlock. Deadlock here is defined as too much information. When many people are talking and providing solutions, this can become a deadlock and have the potential to make the wrong decision.

Low Complexity

Medium Complexity

High Complexity

  • Managing team capacity is indeed very important to save on operational costs for your startup.
  • The 3 early signs when there are too many team members consist of the daily scrum being less effective, there is conflict in the division of tasks, and there is no direction to make a decision.
  • The link between the 3 important elements, namely scope, cost, time, and scope has a close relationship in determining the capacity of your team later.
  • The last is our secret formula for determining the number of teams and roles that must exist in agile development.

Join Coinmonks Telegram Channel and Youtube Channel get daily Crypto News

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here